🔌 Pipe Inputs

📊 Results

Velocity (ft/s)
Friction Loss (ft/100ft)
Reynolds Number
Flow Regime

📚 ASHRAE Velocity Limits

ApplicationMax VelocityNotes
Pump suction3 ft/sPrevent cavitation and noise
Branch / zone supply4 ft/sLow-noise terminal units
Main distribution headers8 ft/sASHRAE recommended maximum
Condenser water10 ft/sLarger pipe, higher tolerance
Friction loss target1–4 ft/100ftDesign target for sizing
Friction loss max4 ft/100ftAbove this → velocity noise risk
Run this for your whole project — free →
Start a free 14-day trial. No credit card.

About This Calculator

This pipe velocity and friction checker computes water velocity, friction loss, and Reynolds number for any nominal Sch 40 pipe size and flow rate. Enter the flow in GPM, pick a pipe size and fluid, and choose an application; the tool returns velocity in ft/s and friction loss in feet per 100 feet, with pass/fail badges against ASHRAE recommended velocity limits.

Velocity that is too high causes noise and erosion-corrosion; too low risks sediment settling. The application selector applies the right velocity ceiling for branch lines, mains, pump suction, condenser water, and domestic cold, so you can confirm a size before committing it.

Formula & Method

VelocityV (ft/s) = Q (GPM) ÷ 449 ÷ A   A = π · d² ÷ 4 (ft)
ReynoldsRe = V · D ÷ ν
Friction fColebrook–White (turbulent); f = 64 ÷ Re (laminar)
Friction losshL = f · (100 ÷ D) · V² ÷ (2 · g)  (ft/100 ft)

Friction uses the Darcy–Weisbach equation with the Colebrook–White friction factor, solved iteratively, per ASHRAE Fundamentals hydronics. The constant 449 converts GPM to ft³/s (1 ft³/s ≈ 449 GPM); ν is the fluid kinematic viscosity (water at 60°F ≈ 1.22 × 10⁻⁵ ft²/s); steel roughness ε ≈ 0.00015 ft; g = 32.174 ft/s². Below Re ≈ 2,300 the flow is laminar and f = 64 ÷ Re.

Frequently Asked Questions

What velocity is too high for hydronic pipe?
It depends on the application. Pump suction is kept at or below about 3 ft/s to avoid cavitation, branch and zone supply at or below about 4 ft/s for low noise, main distribution headers at or below about 8 ft/s, and condenser water up to about 10 ft/s. This tool flags velocity against the limit for the application you select.
What is a good friction loss target?
A common design target is 1 to 4 feet of head per 100 feet of pipe. The tool shows green up to about 2 ft/100ft, amber from 2 to 4, and red above 4 ft/100ft, where velocity noise and pumping energy become a concern. Lower friction saves pump energy but needs larger pipe.
Why does the Reynolds number and flow regime matter?
The Reynolds number tells you whether flow is laminar (below about 2,300), transitional (2,300 to 4,000), or turbulent (above 4,000), and which friction equation applies. Almost all hydronic flow is turbulent, where the tool solves the Colebrook-White equation. In the rare laminar case it uses friction factor equal to 64 divided by Reynolds number.
Does glycol change the result?
Yes. Glycol is more viscous than water, which lowers the Reynolds number and raises friction loss for the same flow and pipe size. The fluid selector includes water at several temperatures and 25 to 40 percent glycol, each with its own kinematic viscosity, so the velocity and friction reflect the actual fluid.

Related Tools

Hydronic Pipe Sizer Pipe Head Loss Pump Head Estimator Glycol Correction Velocity Calculator Pipe Insulation Heat Loss
Free 14-Day Trial  ·  No Credit Card

Do the full calculation in AIM Works

This calculator handles one step. AIM Works runs the complete MEP design workflow — thermal load calculations, duct & pipe networks, equipment selection, code compliance, and an AI design assistant — in one tool.

  • ✓  ASHRAE 62.1 ventilation + CLTD/CLF/RTS load methods
  • ✓  Darcy-Weisbach pipe & duct network solvers
  • ✓  ASHRAE 90.1 / IMC / NFPA advisory compliance checks
  • ✓  20 free AI design messages included in trial
Try It Free for 14 Days →
No credit card  ·  Cancel anytime
See plans & pricing →

Results are design estimates for preliminary sizing. Verify final designs against applicable codes and standards — engineering judgment and a licensed professional engineer’s review are required.